Real-time TPS
Flow TPS is 92.47% less than Arbitrum TPS
Max Recorded TPS
Flow max TPS is 89.64% less than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Flow max theoretical TPS is 90.25% less than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Block Time
Flow block time is 3.2X more than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Flow finality is 98.54% less than Arbitrum finality
Type
Flow is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Governance
Flow off-chain governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Launch Date
Flow was launched 1 year before Arbitrum
Flow vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Flow Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Flow
Flow is a layer one blockchain designed from the ground up for consumer apps and the digital assets that power them. The network runs on a Proof of Stake consensus mechanism with a unique "multi-role" architecture that solves the blockchain trilemma, balancing scalability, efficiency, and cost.
FLOW ($FLOW) is the native utility token that is used for:
- Fees for processing transactions and storing data.
- Buying, selling, and trading assets on Flow
- Staking and delegating to secure the network
Flow tools include:
- Cadence, a purpose-built smart contract programming language designed for consumer-grade applications
- Full EVM equivalence, allowing anything from Ethereum to work on Flow
- Protocol-level account abstraction and mobile support for onboarding new users
- Cross-chain interoperability with the wider web3 ecosystem
- Developer hub with comprehensive documentation and tools
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.