Compare eCash vs BNB Greenfield
eCash vs BNB Greenfield Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
eCash TPS is 72.99% lower than BNB Greenfield TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
eCash max TPS is 30.5% lower than BNB Greenfield max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
eCash max theoretical TPS is 89.51% lower than BNB Greenfield max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
eCash transaction volume is 72.98% lower than BNB Greenfield transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
eCash block time is 161X longer than BNB Greenfield block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
eCash finality is 100% longer than BNB Greenfield finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
eCash and BNB Greenfield are both layer 1 blockchains
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
eCash has 78.81% fewer total transactions than BNB Greenfield
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
eCash was launched 3 years before BNB Greenfield
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs BNB Greenfield Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 50% lower than BNB Greenfield Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
eCash has 1.45X more miners than BNB Greenfield has validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
eCash hashrate is 0.0786 EH/s, while BNB Greenfield stake is $10.41M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
eCash is PoW, while BNB Greenfield is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
eCash council governance is worse than BNB Greenfield on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs BNB Greenfield Developer Activity
Developers
eCash has 75.21% fewer developers than BNB Greenfield
Data from Chainspect
Repos
eCash has 97.22% fewer repos than BNB Greenfield
Data from Chainspect
Commits
eCash has 78.3% fewer commits than BNB Greenfield
Data from Chainspect
Stars
eCash has 90.3% fewer stars than BNB Greenfield
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
eCash has 91.02% fewer watchers than BNB Greenfield
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs BNB Greenfield Financials New
Chain Revenue
eCash has no data, while BNB Greenfield chain revenue is $35.11
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
eCash has no data, while BNB Greenfield average transaction fee is $0.002853
Data from Chainspect
Price
eCash price is $0.00001315, while BNB Greenfield has no data
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
eCash market cap is $262.3M, while BNB Greenfield has no data
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs BNB Greenfield Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
eCash Comparisons
About Blockchains
About eCash
eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
About BNB Greenfield
Positioned as the third blockchain within the BNB Chain ecosystem BNB Greenfield utilizes BNB as its native token. In essence, BNB Greenfield aims to offer decentralized storage infrastructure within the expansive BNB Chain ecosystem. This empowers users and dApps to generate, store, and exchange data while retaining full ownership. The potential outcome is the emergence of a new data-centric economy, enabling all participants within the BNB Chain ecosystem to possess, utilize, and monetize data.