- Compare
- eCash vs Arbitrum Nova
eCash vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
eCash TPS is 0.07 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
eCash max TPS is 31.24 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
eCash max theoretical TPS is 52.43 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
eCash transaction volume is 257 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
eCash block time is 6m 34s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
eCash finality is 10m, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
eCash is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
eCash was launched on Nov 15, 2020, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
eCash vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
eCash has 14 miners, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
eCash hashrate is 0.0877 EH/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
eCash is PoW, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
eCash governance is council, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
eCash Comparisons
About Blockchains
About eCash
eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.