- Compare
- Celo vs Base
Celo vs Base Scalability
Real-time TPS
Celo TPS is 89.63% lower than Base TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Celo max TPS is 78.83% lower than Base max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Celo max theoretical TPS is 86.66% lower than Base max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Celo transaction volume is 89.63% lower than Base transaction volume
Block Time
Celo block time is 50% shorter than Base block time
Finality
Celo finality is 1.88X longer than Base finality
Type
Celo and Base are both layer 2 blockchains
Launch Date
Celo was launched 3 years before Base
Celo vs Base Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Celo Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Base Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Celo and Base have the same amount of validators
Stake
Celo and Base have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Celo and Base are both Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Celo on-chain governance is better than Base off-chain governance
Celo vs Base Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Celo Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Celo
Celo stands as a blockchain ecosystem with a mission to foster cryptocurrency adoption among smartphone users globally. Utilizing phone numbers as public keys, Celo aims to onboard billions of smartphone owners, including those lacking traditional banking access, into cryptocurrency transactions. The platform is engineered to offer a comprehensive range of stablecoins, decentralized identification solutions, and other resources, empowering both users and developers alike.
About Base
Base, an Ethereum-based blockchain developed by Coinbase, operates as a Layer 2 (L2) network, leveraging Optimism to provide a secure, cost-effective, and user-friendly environment for decentralized application (dApp) development. With a mission to onboard the next billion users to web3, Base ensures near-zero fees, quick transactions, and robust security supported by Ethereum's infrastructure. At its launch, Base had over 100 dApps and service providers, aiming to solve the blockchain trilemma by prioritizing interoperability and composability among participating rollups. This approach enhances scalability while preserving security and decentralization.