- Compare
- Arbitrum vs Zeitgeist
Arbitrum vs Zeitgeist Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 100% higher than Zeitgeist TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 11,885X higher than Zeitgeist max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 27X higher than Zeitgeist max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 100% higher than Zeitgeist transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 98.15% shorter than Zeitgeist block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 28X longer than Zeitgeist finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Zeitgeist is a parachain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 4 months before Zeitgeist
Arbitrum vs Zeitgeist Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.42% lower than Zeitgeist Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.83% fewer validators than Zeitgeist
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Zeitgeist stake is $2.947B
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Zeitgeist is Nominated Proof of Stake
Governance
Arbitrum and Zeitgeist governance are both on-chain
Arbitrum vs Zeitgeist Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Zeitgeist
Zeitgeist is a decentralized network designed for establishing, wagering on, and settling prediction markets, enabling users to craft intricate financial agreements on a wide range of subjects. The platform's native currency, ZTG, serves to influence the network's direction and acts as a final recourse for dispute resolution within its decentralized court system.