- Compare
- Arbitrum vs Stellar
Arbitrum vs Stellar Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 68.01% lower than Stellar TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 7.45X higher than Stellar max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 20X higher than Stellar max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 68.01% lower than Stellar transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 95.84% shorter than Stellar block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than Stellar finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Stellar is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 7 years after Stellar
Arbitrum vs Stellar Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 66.66% lower than Stellar Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum has 98.87% fewer validators than Stellar
Stake
Arbitrum and Stellar have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Stellar is Stellar Consensus Protocol
Governance
Arbitrum and Stellar governance are both on-chain
Arbitrum vs Stellar Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Stellar
Stellar empowers builders to unlock human and economic potential. It combines a powerful, decentralized blockchain network with a global ecosystem of innovators to create opportunities as borderless as ideas. It offers the tools to make a difference in the real world through new digital asset products and services that enhance access to the global financial system.