Arbitrum vs Ajuna Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 35.73 tx/s, while Ajuna has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s, while Ajuna has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s, while Ajuna has no data
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 128,612 txns, while Ajuna has no data
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Ajuna has no data
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Ajuna has no data
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Ajuna has no data
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Ajuna has no data
Arbitrum vs Ajuna Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Ajuna has no data
Validators/Miners
Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Ajuna has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Arbitrum and Ajuna have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Ajuna has no data
Governance
Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Ajuna has no data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Ajuna
The Ajuna platform provides a simplified way for Unreal and Unity developers to build an incentive layer into their games using tokenized virtual goods. The partnership with Integritee will allow Ajuna to run entire gaming engines in trusted execution environments to create fast, secure, and scalable decentralized gaming ecosystems.