Acala vs Abstract Scalability
Real-time TPS
Acala and Abstract have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Acala and Abstract have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Acala and Abstract have no data
Transaction Volume
Acala and Abstract have no data
Block Time
Acala and Abstract have no data
Finality
Acala and Abstract have no data
Type
Acala and Abstract have no data
Launch Date
Acala and Abstract have no data
Acala vs Abstract Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Acala and Abstract have no data
Miners
Acala and Abstract have no data
Hashrate
Acala and Abstract have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Acala and Abstract have no data
Governance
Acala and Abstract have no data
Other Comparisons
Acala Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Acala
Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.