- Compare
- ZKsync vs Celo
ZKsync vs Celo Scalability
Real-time TPS
ZKsync has no data, while Celo TPS is 6.65 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
ZKsync has no data, while Celo max TPS is 268.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
ZKsync has no data, while Celo max theoretical TPS is 476.2 tx/s
Transaction Volume
ZKsync has no data, while Celo transaction volume is 23,924 txns
Block Time
ZKsync has no data, while Celo block time is 1s
Finality
ZKsync has no data, while Celo finality is 24m 48s
Type
ZKsync has no data, while Celo is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
ZKsync has no data, while Celo was launched on Apr 22, 2020
ZKsync vs Celo Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
ZKsync has no data, while Celo Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
ZKsync has no data, while Celo has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
ZKsync and Celo have no data
Consensus Mechanism
ZKsync has no data, while Celo is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
ZKsync has no data, while Celo governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
ZKsync Comparisons
About Blockchains
About ZKsync
ZKsync is a Layer-2 scaling solution that makes transactions on Ethereum cheaper and faster by utilizing zero-knowledge rollups (zk-rollups) and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs).
About Celo
Celo stands as a blockchain ecosystem with a mission to foster cryptocurrency adoption among smartphone users globally. Utilizing phone numbers as public keys, Celo aims to onboard billions of smartphone owners, including those lacking traditional banking access, into cryptocurrency transactions. The platform is engineered to offer a comprehensive range of stablecoins, decentralized identification solutions, and other resources, empowering both users and developers alike.