- Compare
- Trac Network vs Waterfall
Trac Network vs Waterfall Scalability
Real-time TPS
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall TPS is 0.23 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall max TPS is 12,693 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 13,333 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall transaction volume is 817 txns
Block Time
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall block time is 5.77s
Finality
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall finality is 24s
Type
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall was launched on Jul 17, 2024
Trac Network vs Waterfall Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Trac Network and Waterfall have no data
Validators/Miners
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall has 63,470 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall stake is $279K
Consensus Mechanism
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall is PoS
Governance
Trac Network has no data, while Waterfall governance is council
Other Comparisons
Trac Network Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Trac Network
Trac Network — unlike traditional blockchains — does not utilize blocks to process transactions. Instead it operates in favor of a constant stream of transactions that are peer-to-peer-validated and settled on decentralized ledgers. The topology of Trac Network allows for near-instant transaction settlement and a better user-experience. Trac Network uses DAGs as well as distributed clocks to maintain linearized and causal order of network messages.
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.