Real-time TPS
Stellar TPS is 2.32X more than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Stellar max TPS is 57.5% less than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Stellar max theoretical TPS is 2.84X more than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Stellar transaction volume is 2.32X more than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Stellar block time is 2.68X more than Polygon block time
Finality
Stellar finality is 100% less than Polygon finality
Nakamoto Coefficient
Stellar and Polygon nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Active Addresses
Stellar and Polygon active addresses are both coming soon
Governance
Stellar on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Type
Stellar is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Stellar was launched 6 years before Polygon
Stellar vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Stellar Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Stellar
Stellar empowers builders to unlock human and economic potential. It combines a powerful, decentralized blockchain network with a global ecosystem of innovators to create opportunities as borderless as ideas. It offers the tools to make a difference in the real world through new digital asset products and services that enhance access to the global financial system.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.