Real-time TPS
Sirius TPS is 99.98% less than Polygon TPS
Max Recorded TPS
Sirius max TPS is 98.74% less than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Sirius max theoretical TPS is 9.67X more than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Block Time
Sirius block time is 6.77X more than Polygon block time
Finality
Sirius finality is 100% less than Polygon finality
Type
Sirius is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a layer 2 blockchain
Governance
Sirius multisig governance is worse than Polygon off-chain governance
Launch Date
Sirius was launched 8 months before Polygon
Sirius vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Sirius Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Sirius
Sirius aims to offer a suite of primary services including blockchain, storage, streaming, and Supercontract. Its architecture allows for the seamless addition of future services without compromising performance. These services are managed and governed by robust consensus protocols, ensuring network integrity while incentivizing decentralized participation. With its parallelized services and protocols organized into distinct layers, Sirius is flexible, easy to adopt, fast, and secure. Packaged within an all-in-one extensible framework, the Sirius ecosystem is well-suited for a range of applications including dApps, DeFi, NFTs, Web3, and beyond.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.