- Compare
- Scroll vs Arbitrum Nova
Scroll vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Scroll TPS is 0.79 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Scroll max TPS is 126.6 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Scroll max theoretical TPS is 136.1 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Scroll transaction volume is 2,846 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Scroll block time is 1.44s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Scroll finality is 3h, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Scroll is a layer 2 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Scroll was launched on Oct 10, 2023, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Scroll vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Scroll Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Scroll has 1 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Scroll and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Scroll is Rollup (ZK), while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Scroll governance is multisig, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Scroll Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Scroll
Scroll, a Layer 2 Ethereum network, aims to simplify scaling solutions for projects utilizing the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Its primary mechanism, zkEVM, integrates zero-knowledge proofs with the EVM, enabling rapid Ethereum transaction confirmation without the need to store and transfer additional transaction data. Scroll aims to establish a universal network that grants developers a user experience and security level akin to Ethereum while surpassing Ethereum in throughput, verification speed, and gas fee affordability
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.