- Compare
- Redbelly vs Arbitrum Nova
Redbelly vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Redbelly TPS is 0.04 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Redbelly max TPS is 73,158 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Redbelly max theoretical TPS is 666,970 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Redbelly transaction volume is 137 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Redbelly block time is 26.15s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Redbelly finality is 0s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Redbelly is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Redbelly was launched on Nov 28, 2024, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Redbelly vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Redbelly and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Validators/Miners
Redbelly and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Stake/Hashrate
Redbelly and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Redbelly is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Redbelly governance is council, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Redbelly Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.