- Compare
- Polygon vs Abstract
Polygon vs Abstract Scalability
Real-time TPS
Polygon TPS is 36.49 tx/s, while Abstract has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s, while Abstract has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s, while Abstract has no data
Transaction Volume
Polygon transaction volume is 131,369 txns, while Abstract has no data
Block Time
Polygon block time is 2.13s, while Abstract has no data
Finality
Polygon finality is 5s, while Abstract has no data
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while Abstract has no data
Launch Date
Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020, while the Abstract has no data
Polygon vs Abstract Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4, while Abstract has no data
Validators/Miners
Polygon has 105 validators, while Abstract has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Polygon stake is $809.8M, while Abstract has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon is PoS, while Abstract has no data
Governance
Polygon governance is off-chain, while Abstract has no data
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.