- Compare
- NitroGraph vs Abstract
NitroGraph vs Abstract Scalability
Real-time TPS
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Transaction Volume
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Block Time
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Finality
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Type
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Launch Date
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
NitroGraph vs Abstract Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Miners
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Hashrate
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Consensus Mechanism
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Governance
NitroGraph and Abstract have no data
Other Comparisons
NitroGraph Comparisons
About Blockchains
About NitroGraph
NitroGraph is the execution layer for AI agents. Built for teams who want to own their models, deploy autonomous agents, and monetize AI at scale.
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.