- Compare
- Frequency vs Abstract
Frequency vs Abstract Scalability
Real-time TPS
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Transaction Volume
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Block Time
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Finality
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Type
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Launch Date
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Frequency vs Abstract Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Miners
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Hashrate
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Governance
Frequency and Abstract have no data
Other Comparisons
Frequency Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Frequency
Frequency enables Web3 social at scale and is the first production implementation of the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP.org). Frequency is designed so that applications collaborate instead of competing when submitting transactions.
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.