- Compare
- Arbitrum Nova vs Redbelly
Arbitrum Nova vs Redbelly Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Redbelly TPS is 0.0078 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Redbelly max TPS is 73,158 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Redbelly max theoretical TPS is 666,970 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Redbelly transaction volume is 28 txns
Block Time
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Redbelly block time is 2m 13s
Finality
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Redbelly finality is 0s
Type
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Redbelly is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Redbelly was launched on Nov 28, 2024
Arbitrum Nova vs Redbelly Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nova and Redbelly have no data
Validators/Miners
Arbitrum Nova and Redbelly have no data
Stake/Hashrate
Arbitrum Nova and Redbelly have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Redbelly is PoS
Governance
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Redbelly governance is council
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Nova Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.