- Compare
- Apertum vs Starknet
Apertum vs Starknet Scalability
Real-time TPS
Apertum has no data, while Starknet TPS is 1.95 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Apertum has no data, while Starknet max TPS is 381.6 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Apertum has no data, while Starknet max theoretical TPS is 992 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Apertum has no data, while Starknet transaction volume is 7,025 txns
Block Time
Apertum has no data, while Starknet block time is 8.12s
Finality
Apertum has no data, while Starknet finality is 2h
Type
Apertum has no data, while Starknet is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Apertum has no data, while Starknet was launched on Nov 16, 2021
Apertum vs Starknet Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Apertum has no data, while Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Apertum has no data, while Starknet has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Apertum and Starknet have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Apertum has no data, while Starknet is Rollup (ZK)
Governance
Apertum has no data, while Starknet governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Apertum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Apertum
Apertum distinguishes itself with a unique combination of features designed for modern technology. Unlike Bitcoin's energy-intensive Proof of Work (PoW) and Ethereum's evolving scalability solutions, Apertum operates as a subnet of the Avalanche blockchain, providing high scalability and fast transactions. Its virtual mining protocol eliminates the need for physical hardware, making mining accessible to everyone. Additionally, its deflationary mechanism burns up to 50% of transaction fees, ensuring long-term value growth while maintaining fairness and transparency.
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.