- Compare
- Apertum vs Acala
Apertum vs Acala Scalability
Real-time TPS
Apertum and Acala have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Apertum and Acala have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Apertum and Acala have no data
Transaction Volume
Apertum and Acala have no data
Block Time
Apertum and Acala have no data
Finality
Apertum and Acala have no data
Type
Apertum and Acala have no data
Launch Date
Apertum and Acala have no data
Apertum vs Acala Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Apertum and Acala have no data
Miners
Apertum and Acala have no data
Hashrate
Apertum and Acala have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Apertum and Acala have no data
Governance
Apertum and Acala have no data
Other Comparisons
Apertum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Apertum
Apertum distinguishes itself with a unique combination of features designed for modern technology. Unlike Bitcoin's energy-intensive Proof of Work (PoW) and Ethereum's evolving scalability solutions, Apertum operates as a subnet of the Avalanche blockchain, providing high scalability and fast transactions. Its virtual mining protocol eliminates the need for physical hardware, making mining accessible to everyone. Additionally, its deflationary mechanism burns up to 50% of transaction fees, ensuring long-term value growth while maintaining fairness and transparency.
About Acala
Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.