Waterfall vs Moonbeam Scalability
Real-time TPS
Waterfall TPS is 92.93% lower than Moonbeam TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Waterfall max TPS is 433X higher than Moonbeam max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 228X higher than Moonbeam max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Waterfall transaction volume is 92.93% lower than Moonbeam transaction volume
Block Time
Waterfall block time is 2.31X longer than Moonbeam block time
Finality
Waterfall finality is 19.99% shorter than Moonbeam finality
Type
Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain, while Moonbeam is a parachain
Launch Date
Waterfall was launched 3 years after Moonbeam
Waterfall vs Moonbeam Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Waterfall has no data, while Moonbeam Nakamoto Coefficient is 174
Validators
Waterfall has 106X more validators than Moonbeam
Stake
Waterfall stake is 99.99% lower than Moonbeam stake
Consensus Mechanism
Waterfall is PoS, while Moonbeam is Nominated Proof of Stake
Governance
Waterfall council governance is worse than Moonbeam on-chain governance
Waterfall vs Moonbeam Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About Moonbeam
Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.