Waterfall vs Crust Scalability
Real-time TPS
Waterfall TPS is 169X higher than Crust TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Waterfall max TPS is 222,682X higher than Crust max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 8.89X higher than Crust max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Waterfall transaction volume is 183X higher than Crust transaction volume
Block Time
Waterfall block time is 4.39% shorter than Crust block time
Finality
Waterfall finality is 19.99% shorter than Crust finality
Type
Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain, while Crust is a parachain
Launch Date
Waterfall was launched 2 years after Crust
Waterfall vs Crust Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Waterfall has no data, while Crust Nakamoto Coefficient is 174
Validators
Waterfall has 106X more validators than Crust
Stake
Waterfall stake is 99.99% lower than Crust stake
Consensus Mechanism
Waterfall is PoS, while Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake
Governance
Waterfall council governance is worse than Crust on-chain governance
Waterfall vs Crust Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.