- Compare
- Waterfall vs BNB Greenfield
Waterfall vs BNB Greenfield Scalability
Real-time TPS
Waterfall TPS is 70.5% lower than BNB Greenfield TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Waterfall max TPS is 282X higher than BNB Greenfield max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 27X higher than BNB Greenfield max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Waterfall transaction volume is 70.5% lower than BNB Greenfield transaction volume
Block Time
Waterfall block time is 5.65X longer than BNB Greenfield block time
Finality
Waterfall finality is 100% longer than BNB Greenfield finality
Type
Waterfall and BNB Greenfield are both layer 1 blockchains
Launch Date
Waterfall was launched 9 months after BNB Greenfield
Waterfall vs BNB Greenfield Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Waterfall has no data, while BNB Greenfield Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators
Waterfall has 5,770X more validators than BNB Greenfield
Stake
Waterfall stake is 96.97% lower than BNB Greenfield stake
Consensus Mechanism
Waterfall and BNB Greenfield are both PoS
Governance
Waterfall council governance is worse than BNB Greenfield on-chain governance
Waterfall vs BNB Greenfield Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
BNB Greenfield Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About BNB Greenfield
Positioned as the third blockchain within the BNB Chain ecosystem BNB Greenfield utilizes BNB as its native token. In essence, BNB Greenfield aims to offer decentralized storage infrastructure within the expansive BNB Chain ecosystem. This empowers users and dApps to generate, store, and exchange data while retaining full ownership. The potential outcome is the emergence of a new data-centric economy, enabling all participants within the BNB Chain ecosystem to possess, utilize, and monetize data.