Stellar vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Stellar TPS is 111.7 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Stellar max TPS is 182.3 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Stellar max theoretical TPS is 2,032 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Stellar transaction volume is 402,132 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Stellar block time is 6.01s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Stellar finality is 0s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Stellar is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Stellar was launched on Jul 31, 2014, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stellar vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Stellar Nakamoto Coefficient is 3, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Stellar has 89 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Stellar and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Stellar is Stellar Consensus Protocol, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Stellar governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Stellar Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Stellar
Stellar empowers builders to unlock human and economic potential. It combines a powerful, decentralized blockchain network with a global ecosystem of innovators to create opportunities as borderless as ideas. It offers the tools to make a difference in the real world through new digital asset products and services that enhance access to the global financial system.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.