Algorand 
Aptos 
Arbitrum 
Avalanche 
Base 
Bitcoin 
BNB Chain 
BSV Blockchain 
Cardano 
Cronos 
eCash 
Ethereum 
Etherlink 
Fogo 
Hedera 
ICP 
IoTeX 
Kaia 
Keeta Mainnet 
Keeta Testnet 
Kusama 
Moonbeam 
MultiversX 
NEAR 
Optimism 
Polkadot 
Polygon 
Redbelly 
Sei 
Solana 
Somnia 
Starknet 
Stellar 
Sui 
Tezos 
Tezos Ecosystem 
TON 
TRON 
Wanchain 
Abstract 
Aurora 
Avail 
B² Network 
Babylon 
Boba Network 
Chromia 
Cosmos 
Flare 
Gravity 
Hyperliquid 
Immutable X 
Immutable zkEVM 
Injective 
Ink 
Katana 
Kava 
Lens Chain 
Linea 
Lisk 
Manta Network 
Mantle 
MegaETH 
Metis 
Monad 
N1 
Neo 
Noble 
Particle 
Plume 
Quai Network 
RISE 
Ronin 
Skale 
Solayer 
Soon 
Sophon 
Supra 
Taiko 
Trac Network 
Unichain 
UPCX 
VeChain 
XDC Network 
XRP Ledger Compare Sonic vs Waterfall
Open in ChatGPTSonic vs Waterfall Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Sonic TPS is 3.06X higher than Waterfall TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Sonic max TPS is 96.48% lower than Waterfall max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Sonic max theoretical TPS is 9.52X higher than Waterfall max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Sonic transaction volume is 3.06X higher than Waterfall transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Sonic block time is 57.01% shorter than Waterfall block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Sonic finality is 100% shorter than Waterfall finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Sonic and Waterfall are both layer 1 blockchains
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Sonic has 7.11X more total transactions than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Sonic was launched 5 months after Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Waterfall Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Sonic Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Sonic has 9.5X more validators than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Sonic stake is $30.98M, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Sonic and Waterfall are both PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Sonic on-chain governance is better than Waterfall council governance
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Waterfall Developer Activity
Developers
Sonic has 86.97% fewer developers than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Sonic has 37.37% fewer commits than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Sonic has 1.07X more repos than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Sonic has 32X more stars than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Sonic has 41X more watchers than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Waterfall Financials New
Chain Revenue
Sonic chain revenue is $144.6, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Sonic average transaction fee is $0.001069, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Sonic market cap is $72.77M, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Sonic FDV is 100% higher than Waterfall FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Sonic Market Cap to FDV ratio is 89.37%, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
Price
Sonic price is $0.02527, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Waterfall Real-time TPS Chart
Other Comparisons
Sonic Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Sonic
Sonic is the highest-performing EVM layer-1 blockchain, combining speed, incentives, and world-class infrastructure, powering the next generation of DeFi applications. The chain provides 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality.
By combining a novel consensus mechanism with full EVM compatibility, Sonic delivers unparalleled speed, security, and scalability. The S token is Sonic's native token, used for paying transaction fees, staking, running validators, and participating in governance.
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.