- Compare
- QFnetwork vs Abstract
QFnetwork vs Abstract Scalability
Real-time TPS
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Transaction Volume
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Block Time
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Finality
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Type
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Launch Date
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
QFnetwork vs Abstract Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Miners
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Hashrate
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Consensus Mechanism
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Governance
QFnetwork and Abstract have no data
Other Comparisons
QFnetwork Comparisons
About Blockchains
About QFnetwork
QFnetwork merges cutting-edge technologies to revolutionize blockchain, by integrating advanced consensus protocols, parallel execution, innovative storage solutions and more. Delivering unparalleled speed, scalability, and developer-friendly tools. QF network is here to break the barriers that have held dApps back from mass adoption.
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.