- Compare
- Optimism vs Starknet
Optimism vs Starknet Scalability
Real-time TPS
Optimism TPS is 18X higher than Starknet TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Optimism max TPS is 47.52% lower than Starknet max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Optimism max theoretical TPS is 27.99% lower than Starknet max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Optimism transaction volume is 18X higher than Starknet transaction volume
Block Time
Optimism block time is 74.82% shorter than Starknet block time
Finality
Optimism finality is 87.34% shorter than Starknet finality
Type
Optimism and Starknet are both layer 2 blockchains
Launch Date
Optimism was launched 29 days after Starknet
Optimism vs Starknet Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Optimism Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Optimism and Starknet have the same amount of validators
Stake
Optimism and Starknet have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Optimism is Rollup (Optimistic), while Starknet is Rollup (ZK)
Governance
Optimism and Starknet governance are both on-chain
Optimism vs Starknet Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Optimism Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Optimism
Optimism provides a Layer 2 scaling fix for Ethereum, greatly boosting its scalability and cutting down on gas fees. It maintains robust security measures and guarantees a smooth development experience. Through Optimistic Rollups, it enables swift transaction processing, positioning Ethereum as a viable option for deploying intricate and interactive applications.
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.