- Compare
- IOTA vs Polygon
IOTA vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
IOTA has no data, while Polygon TPS is 48.92 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
IOTA has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
IOTA has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
IOTA has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 176,109 txns
Block Time
IOTA has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
IOTA has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
IOTA has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
IOTA has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
IOTA vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
IOTA has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators/Miners
IOTA has no data, while Polygon has 103 validators
Stake/Hashrate
IOTA has no data, while Polygon stake is 3.501B MATIC
Consensus Mechanism
IOTA has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
IOTA has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
IOTA Comparisons
About Blockchains
About IOTA
IOTA is the first distributed ledger built for the “Internet of Everything” - a network for exchanging value and data between humans and machines.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.