ICP vs Starknet Scalability
Real-time TPS
ICP TPS is 567X higher than Starknet TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
ICP max TPS is 67X higher than Starknet max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
ICP max theoretical TPS is 211X higher than Starknet max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
ICP transaction volume is 567X higher than Starknet transaction volume
Block Time
ICP block time is 94.08% shorter than Starknet block time
Finality
ICP finality is 100% shorter than Starknet finality
Type
ICP is a layer 1 blockchain, while Starknet is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
ICP was launched 6 months before Starknet
ICP vs Starknet Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
ICP Nakamoto Coefficient is 415X higher than Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
ICP has 1,448X more validators than Starknet
Stake
ICP stake is $1.181B, while Starknet has no data
Consensus Mechanism
ICP is Proof of Useful Work, while Starknet is Rollup (ZK)
Governance
ICP and Starknet governance are both on-chain
ICP vs Starknet Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
ICP Comparisons
About Blockchains
About ICP
The Internet Computer enables you to build anything without traditional IT and Big Tech. It hosts decentralized serverless compute that’s simpler, immune to cyber attack, unstoppable, and controllable by DAOs. Next-generation smart contracts (named Canisters) that hold both code and state enable truly Decentralized AI. Canisters use Chain Fusion technology to write transctions directly to other chains without centralized bridges, enabling secure multi-chain dapps. Build social, defi, games, e-commerce, enterprise or any kind of application or service on ICP. The internet is evolving.
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.