- Compare
- ICP vs Arbitrum Nova
ICP vs Arbitrum Nova
ICP vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
ICP TPS is 1,106 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
ICP max TPS is 25,621 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
ICP max theoretical TPS is 209,708 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
ICP transaction volume is 3,982,706 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
ICP block time is 0.48s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
ICP finality is 0s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
ICP is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
ICP was launched on May 10, 2021, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
ICP vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
ICP Nakamoto Coefficient is 415, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
ICP has 1,448 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
ICP stake is $1.181B, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
ICP is Proof of Useful Work, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
ICP governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
ICP Comparisons
About Blockchains
About ICP
The Internet Computer enables you to build anything without traditional IT and Big Tech. It hosts decentralized serverless compute that’s simpler, immune to cyber attack, unstoppable, and controllable by DAOs. Next-generation smart contracts (named Canisters) that hold both code and state enable truly Decentralized AI. Canisters use Chain Fusion technology to write transctions directly to other chains without centralized bridges, enabling secure multi-chain dapps. Build social, defi, games, e-commerce, enterprise or any kind of application or service on ICP. The internet is evolving.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.