- Compare
- Fantom vs Polygon
Fantom vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Fantom TPS is 90.41% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Fantom max TPS is 57.91% lower than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Fantom max theoretical TPS is 2.07X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Fantom transaction volume is 90.41% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Fantom block time is 54.71% shorter than Polygon block time
Finality
Fantom finality is 100% shorter than Polygon finality
Type
Fantom is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Fantom was launched 5 months before Polygon
Fantom vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Fantom Nakamoto Coefficient is 50% lower than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Fantom has 86.4% fewer validators than Polygon
Stake
Fantom stake is 73.94M FTM, while Polygon stake is 3.514B MATIC
Consensus Mechanism
Fantom and Polygon are both PoS
Governance
Fantom on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Fantom vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Fantom Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Fantom
Fantom is a high-performance, scalable, and secure smart contract platform engineered to surpass the constraints of preceding blockchain platforms. Operating as a permissionless, decentralized, and open-source network, Fantom leverages Lachesis, its asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerance (aBFT) consensus mechanism. This innovative approach enables Fantom to achieve remarkable speed and affordability compared to older technologies while maintaining exceptional security standards.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.