Compare Etherlink vs Sonic
Open in ChatGPTEtherlink vs Sonic Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Etherlink TPS is 19.9% lower than Sonic TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Etherlink max TPS is 97.55% lower than Sonic max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Etherlink max theoretical TPS is 99.9% lower than Sonic max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Etherlink transaction volume is 19.9% lower than Sonic transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Etherlink block time is 11.38% shorter than Sonic block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Etherlink finality is 100% longer than Sonic finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Etherlink is a layer 2 blockchain, while Sonic is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Etherlink has 66.72% fewer total transactions than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Etherlink was launched 3 months after Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Sonic Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Etherlink Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Sonic Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Etherlink has 97.43% fewer validators than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Etherlink has no data, while Sonic stake is $83.24M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Etherlink is Rollup (Optimistic), while Sonic is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Etherlink and Sonic governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Sonic Developer Activity
Developers
Etherlink has 1.71X more developers than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Etherlink has 67.37% fewer commits than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Etherlink has 1.29X more repos than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Etherlink has 68.67% fewer stars than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Etherlink has 89.41% fewer watchers than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Sonic Financials New
Chain Revenue
Etherlink chain revenue is 14.29% lower than Sonic chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Etherlink average transaction fee is 3.91% lower than Sonic average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Etherlink has no data, while Sonic market cap is $196.9M
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Etherlink has no data, while Sonic FDV is $220.4M
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Etherlink has no data, while Sonic Market Cap to FDV ratio is 89.37%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Etherlink has no data, while Sonic price is $0.06838
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Sonic Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Etherlink Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Etherlink
Etherlink is an EVM-compatible, non-custodial Layer 2 blockchain powered by Tezos Smart Rollup technology. It enables seamless integration with existing Ethereum tools, including wallets and indexers, and facilitates asset transfers to and from other EVM-compatible chains. Built upon the secure foundation of Tezos layer 1, Etherlink delivers a fast, fair, and (nearly) free experience. This permissionless and censorship-resistant environment empowers developers to actively create and participate in the next generation of decentralized applications.
Explore the full ecosystem here: Tezos Ecosystem
About Sonic
Sonic is the highest-performing EVM layer-1 blockchain, combining speed, incentives, and world-class infrastructure, powering the next generation of DeFi applications. The chain provides 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality.
By combining a novel consensus mechanism with full EVM compatibility, Sonic delivers unparalleled speed, security, and scalability. The S token is Sonic's native token, used for paying transaction fees, staking, running validators, and participating in governance.