Compare Etherlink vs Sonic
Open in ChatGPTEtherlink vs Sonic Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Etherlink TPS is 3.25X higher than Sonic TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Etherlink max TPS is 97.55% lower than Sonic max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Etherlink max theoretical TPS is 99.9% lower than Sonic max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Etherlink transaction volume is 3.25X higher than Sonic transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Etherlink block time is 42.37% shorter than Sonic block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Etherlink finality is 100% longer than Sonic finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Etherlink is a layer 2 blockchain, while Sonic is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Etherlink has 70.62% fewer total transactions than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Etherlink was launched 3 months after Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Sonic Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Etherlink Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Sonic Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Etherlink has 97.43% fewer validators than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Etherlink has no data, while Sonic stake is $120.1M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Etherlink is Rollup (Optimistic), while Sonic is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Etherlink and Sonic governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Sonic Developer Activity
Developers
Etherlink has 1.69X more developers than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Etherlink has 68.12% fewer commits than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Etherlink has 1.38X more repos than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Etherlink has 69.51% fewer stars than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Etherlink has 89.28% fewer watchers than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Sonic Financials New
Chain Revenue
Etherlink chain revenue is 61.32% lower than Sonic chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Etherlink average transaction fee is 54.16% lower than Sonic average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Etherlink has no data, while Sonic market cap is $268.9M
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Etherlink has no data, while Sonic FDV is $300.8M
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Etherlink has no data, while Sonic Market Cap to FDV ratio is 89.37%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Etherlink has no data, while Sonic price is $0.09335
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Sonic Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Etherlink Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Etherlink
Etherlink is an EVM-compatible, non-custodial Layer 2 blockchain powered by Tezos Smart Rollup technology. It enables seamless integration with existing Ethereum tools, including wallets and indexers, and facilitates asset transfers to and from other EVM-compatible chains. Built upon the secure foundation of Tezos layer 1, Etherlink delivers a fast, fair, and (nearly) free experience. This permissionless and censorship-resistant environment empowers developers to actively create and participate in the next generation of decentralized applications.
Explore the full ecosystem here: Tezos Ecosystem
About Sonic
Sonic is the highest-performing EVM layer-1 blockchain, combining speed, incentives, and world-class infrastructure, powering the next generation of DeFi applications. The chain provides 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality.
By combining a novel consensus mechanism with full EVM compatibility, Sonic delivers unparalleled speed, security, and scalability. The S token is Sonic's native token, used for paying transaction fees, staking, running validators, and participating in governance.