Compare eCash vs Waterfall
Open in ChatGPTeCash vs Waterfall Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
eCash TPS is 96.98% lower than Waterfall TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
eCash max TPS is 99.9% lower than Waterfall max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
eCash max theoretical TPS is 99.87% lower than Waterfall max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
eCash transaction volume is 97.25% lower than Waterfall transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
eCash block time is 268X longer than Waterfall block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
eCash finality is 25X longer than Waterfall finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
eCash and Waterfall are both layer 1 blockchains
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
eCash has 70.49% fewer total transactions than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
eCash was launched 4 years before Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Waterfall Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 3, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
eCash has 99.97% fewer miners than Waterfall has validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
eCash hashrate is 0.0543 EH/s, while Waterfall stake is $471.4K
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
eCash is PoW, while Waterfall is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
eCash and Waterfall governance are both council
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Waterfall Developer Activity
Developers
eCash has 74X more developers than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Commits
eCash has 153X more commits than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Repos
eCash has 50% fewer repos than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Stars
eCash has 450X more stars than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
eCash has 77X more watchers than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Waterfall Financials New
Chain Revenue
eCash chain revenue is 99.99% lower than Waterfall chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
eCash average transaction fee is 99.99% lower than Waterfall average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
eCash market cap is $139.4M, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
FDV
eCash FDV is 51X higher than Waterfall FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
eCash Market Cap to FDV ratio is 95.30%, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
Price
eCash price is 93.74% lower than Waterfall price
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Waterfall Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
eCash Comparisons
About Blockchains
About eCash
eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.