Crust vs Waterfall Scalability
Real-time TPS
Crust TPS is 100% lower than Waterfall TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Crust max TPS is 99.99% lower than Waterfall max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Crust max theoretical TPS is 88.74% lower than Waterfall max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Crust transaction volume is 100% lower than Waterfall transaction volume
Block Time
Crust block time is 1.07X longer than Waterfall block time
Finality
Crust finality is 1.25X longer than Waterfall finality
Type
Crust is a parachain, while Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Crust was launched 2 years before Waterfall
Crust vs Waterfall Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Crust Nakamoto Coefficient is 174, while Waterfall has no data
Validators
Crust has 99.05% fewer validators than Waterfall
Stake
Crust stake is 10,560X higher than Waterfall stake
Consensus Mechanism
Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Waterfall is PoS
Governance
Crust on-chain governance is better than Waterfall council governance
Crust vs Waterfall Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Crust Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.