Compare Arbitrum vs ICP
Open in ChatGPTArbitrum vs ICP Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Arbitrum TPS is 96.95% lower than ICP TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 94.52% lower than ICP max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 97.09% lower than ICP max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Arbitrum transaction volume is 96.95% lower than ICP transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Arbitrum block time is 47.97% shorter than ICP block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than ICP finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while ICP is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Arbitrum has 99.31% fewer total transactions than ICP
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 4 months after ICP
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs ICP Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 92.85% lower than ICP Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.85% fewer validators than ICP
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while ICP stake is $732.3M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while ICP is Proof of Useful Work
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Arbitrum and ICP governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs ICP Developer Activity
Developers
Arbitrum has 3.15X more developers than ICP
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Arbitrum has 1.75X more commits than ICP
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Arbitrum has 23.21% fewer repos than ICP
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Arbitrum has 1.33X more stars than ICP
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Arbitrum has 19.42% fewer watchers than ICP
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs ICP Financials New
Chain Revenue
Arbitrum chain revenue is 9.77% lower than ICP chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Arbitrum average transaction fee is 27X higher than ICP average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Arbitrum market cap is 32.2% lower than ICP market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Arbitrum FDV is 1.19X higher than ICP FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 42.8% lower than ICP Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Arbitrum price is 93.52% lower than ICP price
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs ICP Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About ICP
The Internet Computer is a decentralized cloud blockchain that pursues the $1+ trillion cloud market — hosting apps, websites and enterprise systems, fully onchain, where they benefit from extraordinary security and resilience, can do multi-chain token processing, and can be administered in a decentralized way for safety.
A core purpose is “self-writing cloud”, where AI creates apps for mass market users, which are sophisticated and secure, in response to instructions they provide over chat.
The ICP token is burned powering onchain apps, and is a cryptocurrency used in network governance staking.
It’s easy to try — use AI to create onchain apps (e.g. caffeine.ai) or use an online IDE to write serverless code yourself (e.g. icp.ninja)!