Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 97.81% less than ICP TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 95.68% less than ICP max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 80.92% less than ICP max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 97.81% less than ICP transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 47.93% less than ICP block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 100% more than ICP finality
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum and ICP nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Active Addresses
Arbitrum and ICP active addresses are both coming soon
Governance
Arbitrum and ICP governance are both on-chain
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while ICP is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 4 months after ICP
Arbitrum vs ICP Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About ICP
The Internet Computer enables you to build anything without traditional IT and Big Tech. It hosts decentralized serverless compute that’s simpler, immune to cyber attack, unstoppable, and controllable by DAOs. Next-generation smart contracts (named Canisters) that hold both code and state enable truly Decentralized AI. Canisters use Chain Fusion technology to write transctions directly to other chains without centralized bridges, enabling secure multi-chain dapps. Build social, defi, games, e-commerce, enterprise or any kind of application or service on ICP. The internet is evolving.