Acala vs Crust Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Acala has no data, while Crust TPS is 0 tx/s

Acala logo
Crust logo
0 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Acala has no data, while Crust max TPS is 0.06 tx/s

Acala logo
Crust logo
0.06 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Acala has no data, while Crust max theoretical TPS is 1,500 tx/s

Acala logo
Crust logo
1,500 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Acala has no data, while Crust transaction volume is 0 txns

Acala logo
Crust logo
0 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Acala has no data, while Crust block time is 12.75s

Acala logo
Crust logo
12.75s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Acala has no data, while Crust finality is 30s

Acala logo
Crust logo
30s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Acala has no data, while Crust is a parachain

Acala logo
Crust logo
Parachain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

Neither Acala nor Crust have data for total transactions

Acala logo
Crust logo

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Acala has no data, while Crust was launched on Nov 21, 2022

Acala logo
Crust logo
Nov 21, 2022

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs Crust Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Acala has no data, while Crust Nakamoto Coefficient is 178

Acala logo
Crust logo
178

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Acala has no data, while Crust has 600 validators

Acala logo
Crust logo
600

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Acala has no data, while Crust stake is $1.942B

Acala logo
Crust logo
$1.942B

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Acala has no data, while Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake

Acala logo
Crust logo
Nominated Proof of Stake

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Acala has no data, while Crust governance is on-chain

Acala logo
Crust logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs Crust Developer Activity

Developers

Acala has no data, while Crust has 178 developers

Acala logo
Crust logo
178

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Acala has no data, while Crust has 75 repos

Acala logo
Crust logo
75

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Acala has no data, while Crust has 11,696 commits

Acala logo
Crust logo
11,696

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Acala has no data, while Crust has 1,056 stars

Acala logo
Crust logo
1,056

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Acala has no data, while Crust has 349 watchers

Acala logo
Crust logo
349

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs Crust Financials New

Chain Revenue

Acala and Crust have no data

Acala logo
Crust logo

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Acala and Crust have no data

Acala logo
Crust logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Acala has no data, while Crust market cap is $666.7K

Acala logo
Crust logo
$666.7K

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Acala has no data, while Crust FDV is $1.652M

Acala logo
Crust logo
$1.652M

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Acala has no data, while Crust Market Cap to FDV ratio is 40.37%

Acala logo
Crust logo
40.37%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Acala has no data, while Crust price is $0.04716

Acala logo
Crust logo
$0.04716

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Acala

Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.

About Crust

Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.

Blockchains Socials

Acala Socials

Crust Socials