- Compare
- Acala vs Crust
Acala vs Crust Scalability
Real-time TPS
Acala has no data, while Crust TPS is 0.0006 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Acala has no data, while Crust max TPS is 0.06 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Acala has no data, while Crust max theoretical TPS is 1,500 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Acala has no data, while Crust transaction volume is 2 txns
Block Time
Acala has no data, while Crust block time is 14.46s
Finality
Acala has no data, while Crust finality is 30s
Type
Acala has no data, while Crust is a parachain
Launch Date
Acala has no data, while Crust was launched on Nov 21, 2022
Acala vs Crust Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Acala has no data, while Crust Nakamoto Coefficient is 174
Validators/Miners
Acala has no data, while Crust has 600 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Acala has no data, while Crust stake is $2.947B
Consensus Mechanism
Acala has no data, while Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake
Governance
Acala has no data, while Crust governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Acala Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Acala
Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.