- Compare
- Zeitgeist vs Polygon
Zeitgeist vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Zeitgeist TPS is 100% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Zeitgeist max TPS is 99.97% lower than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Zeitgeist max theoretical TPS is 2.1X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Zeitgeist transaction volume is 100% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Zeitgeist block time is 6.38X longer than Polygon block time
Finality
Zeitgeist finality is 6X longer than Polygon finality
Type
Zeitgeist is a parachain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Zeitgeist was launched 2 years after Polygon
Zeitgeist vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Zeitgeist Nakamoto Coefficient is 44X higher than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Zeitgeist has 5.71X more validators than Polygon
Stake
Zeitgeist stake is 3.64X higher than Polygon stake
Consensus Mechanism
Zeitgeist is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Zeitgeist on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Zeitgeist vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Zeitgeist Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Zeitgeist
Zeitgeist is a decentralized network designed for establishing, wagering on, and settling prediction markets, enabling users to craft intricate financial agreements on a wide range of subjects. The platform's native currency, ZTG, serves to influence the network's direction and acts as a final recourse for dispute resolution within its decentralized court system.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.