Advertise on Chainspect

Compare Waterfall vs TON

Waterfall vs TON TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Waterfall TPS is 100% lower than TON TPS

Waterfall logo
0 tx/s
TON logo
24.12 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Waterfall max TPS is 54X higher than TON max TPS

Waterfall logo
83,333 tx/s
TON logo
1,542 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 60.21% lower than TON max theoretical TPS

Waterfall logo
41,666 tx/s
TON logo
104,715 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Waterfall transaction volume is 100% lower than TON transaction volume

Waterfall logo
0 txns
TON logo
86.8K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Waterfall block time is 100% shorter than TON block time

Waterfall logo
0s
TON logo
412ms

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Waterfall finality is 30X longer than TON finality

Waterfall logo
24s
TON logo
800ms

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Waterfall has 99.04% fewer total transactions than TON

Waterfall logo
34.1M txns
TON logo
3.58B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Waterfall was launched 3 years after TON

Waterfall logo
Jul 17, 2024
TON logo
May 26, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Waterfall vs TON Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is 98.75% lower than TON Nakamoto Coefficient

Waterfall logo
1
TON logo
80

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Waterfall has 98.93% fewer validators than TON

Waterfall logo
4
TON logo
377

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Waterfall has no data, while TON stake is $890.4M

Waterfall logo
—
TON logo
$890.4M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Waterfall and TON are both PoS

Waterfall logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)
TON logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Waterfall council governance is worse than TON on-chain governance

Waterfall logo
Council
TON logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Waterfall vs TON Developer Activity

Developers

Waterfall has 1.27X more developers than TON

Waterfall logo
791
TON logo
624

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Waterfall has 31.51% fewer commits than TON

Waterfall logo
23,574
TON logo
34,420

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Waterfall has 92.74% fewer repos than TON

Waterfall logo
14
TON logo
193

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Waterfall has 99.98% fewer stars than TON

Waterfall logo
3
TON logo
17,452

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Waterfall has 99.88% fewer watchers than TON

Waterfall logo
2
TON logo
1,693

Data from Chainspect

Waterfall vs TON Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue

Waterfall has no data, while TON on-chain revenue is $2.228K

Waterfall logo
—
TON logo
$2.228K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Waterfall has no data, while TON average transaction fee is $0.0006266

Waterfall logo
—
TON logo
$0.0006266

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Waterfall has no data, while TON market cap is $3.846B

Waterfall logo
—
TON logo
$3.846B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Waterfall has no data, while TON FDV is $7.161B

Waterfall logo
—
TON logo
$7.161B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Waterfall has no data, while TON Market Cap to FDV ratio is 53.71%

Waterfall logo
—
TON logo
53.71%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Waterfall has no data, while TON price is $1.359

Waterfall logo
—
TON logo
$1.359

Data from Chainspect

Waterfall vs TON Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow