Redbelly vs eCash Scalability
Real-time TPS
Redbelly TPS is 75.32% lower than eCash TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Redbelly max TPS is 2,341X higher than eCash max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Redbelly max theoretical TPS is 12,721X higher than eCash max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Redbelly transaction volume is 75.34% lower than eCash transaction volume
Block Time
Redbelly block time is 87.13% shorter than eCash block time
Finality
Redbelly finality is 100% shorter than eCash finality
Type
Redbelly and eCash are both layer 1 blockchains
Launch Date
Redbelly was launched 4 years after eCash
Redbelly vs eCash Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Redbelly has no data, while eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Redbelly has no data, while eCash has 14 miners
Stake/Hashrate
Redbelly has no data, while eCash hashrate is 0.0877 EH/s
Consensus Mechanism
Redbelly is PoS, while eCash is PoW
Governance
Redbelly and eCash governance are both council
Redbelly vs eCash Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Redbelly Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.
About eCash
eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.