Polygon vs Waterfall Scalability
Real-time TPS
Polygon TPS is 383X higher than Waterfall TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 96.61% lower than Waterfall max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 94.64% lower than Waterfall max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Polygon transaction volume is 383X higher than Waterfall transaction volume
Block Time
Polygon block time is 85.02% shorter than Waterfall block time
Finality
Polygon finality is 79.16% shorter than Waterfall finality
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Polygon was launched 4 years before Waterfall
Polygon vs Waterfall Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4, while Waterfall has no data
Validators
Polygon has 99.83% fewer validators than Waterfall
Stake
Polygon stake is 2,902X higher than Waterfall stake
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon and Waterfall are both PoS
Governance
Polygon off-chain governance is better than Waterfall council governance
Polygon vs Waterfall Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.