Compare Polygon vs Waterfall
Open in ChatGPTPolygon vs Waterfall Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Polygon TPS is 183X higher than Waterfall TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 98.34% lower than Waterfall max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 94.28% lower than Waterfall max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Polygon transaction volume is 183X higher than Waterfall transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Polygon block time is 39.93% shorter than Waterfall block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Polygon finality is 79.16% shorter than Waterfall finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Polygon has 258X more total transactions than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Polygon was launched 4 years before Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Waterfall Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Polygon has 26X more validators than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Polygon stake is 4,386X higher than Waterfall stake
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon and Waterfall are both PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Polygon off-chain governance is better than Waterfall council governance
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Waterfall Developer Activity
Developers
Polygon has 138X more developers than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Polygon has 270X more commits than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Polygon has 21X more repos than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Polygon has 3,159X more stars than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Polygon has 840X more watchers than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Waterfall Financials New
Chain Revenue
Polygon chain revenue is 70,140,799X higher than Waterfall chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Polygon average transaction fee is 236,940X higher than Waterfall average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Polygon market cap is $989.7M, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Polygon FDV is 2,390X higher than Waterfall FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio is 100.00%, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
Price
Polygon price is 5,814X higher than Waterfall price
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Waterfall Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.