- Compare
- Polygon vs Redbelly
Polygon vs Redbelly Scalability
Real-time TPS
Polygon TPS is 2,433X higher than Redbelly TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 99.41% lower than Redbelly max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 99.89% lower than Redbelly max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Polygon transaction volume is 2,433X higher than Redbelly transaction volume
Block Time
Polygon block time is 96.7% shorter than Redbelly block time
Finality
Polygon finality is 100% longer than Redbelly finality
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while Redbelly is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Polygon was launched 5 years before Redbelly
Polygon vs Redbelly Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4, while Redbelly has no data
Validators
Polygon has 105 validators, while Redbelly has no data
Stake
Polygon stake is $809.8M, while Redbelly has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon and Redbelly are both PoS
Governance
Polygon off-chain governance is better than Redbelly council governance
Polygon vs Redbelly Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.