- Compare
- Polygon vs BSV Blockchain
Polygon vs BSV Blockchain Scalability
Real-time TPS
Polygon TPS is 4.37X higher than BSV Blockchain TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 78.27% lower than BSV Blockchain max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 97.75% lower than BSV Blockchain max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Polygon transaction volume is 4.37X higher than BSV Blockchain transaction volume
Block Time
Polygon block time is 99.57% shorter than BSV Blockchain block time
Finality
Polygon finality is 99.86% shorter than BSV Blockchain finality
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while BSV Blockchain is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Polygon was launched 2 years after BSV Blockchain
Polygon vs BSV Blockchain Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than BSV Blockchain Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators/Miners
Polygon has 15X more validators than BSV Blockchain has miners
Stake/Hashrate
Polygon stake is $809.8M, while BSV Blockchain hashrate is 0.255 EH/s
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon is PoS, while BSV Blockchain is PoW
Governance
Polygon and BSV Blockchain governance are both off-chain
Polygon vs BSV Blockchain Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About BSV Blockchain
The BSV blockchain is uniquely equipped to address your business or government needs with its scalability, micropayments, and low fees.