- Compare
- Polygon vs Arbitrum Nova
Polygon vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Polygon TPS is 36.49 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Polygon transaction volume is 131,369 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Polygon block time is 2.13s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Polygon finality is 5s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Polygon vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Polygon has 105 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Polygon stake is $809.8M, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Polygon governance is off-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.