- Compare
- Litentry vs Arbitrum Nova
Litentry vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Transaction Volume
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Block Time
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Finality
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Type
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Launch Date
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Litentry vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Miners
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Hashrate
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Governance
Litentry and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Other Comparisons
Litentry Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Litentry
Litentry is a Decentralized Identity Aggregation protocol across multiple networks. It features a DID indexing mechanism and a Substrate-based credit computation network. The protocol provides a decentralized, interoperable identity aggregation service that mitigates the difficulty of resolving agnostic DID mechanisms.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.