- Compare
- Hedera vs Arbitrum Nova
Hedera vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Hedera TPS is 3.36 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Hedera max TPS is 3,302 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Hedera max theoretical TPS is 10,000 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Hedera transaction volume is 12,102 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Hedera block time is 2s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Hedera finality is 0s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Hedera is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Hedera was launched on Sep 16, 2019, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Hedera vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Hedera Nakamoto Coefficient is 6, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Hedera has 31 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Hedera stake is $3.439B, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Hedera is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Hedera governance is council, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Hedera Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Hedera
Hedera operates as a public network employing the hashgraph consensus algorithm for rapid and secure transaction validation. Governed by a council of esteemed organizations, Hedera ensures consistent progress and decentralization. Distinguished by its high throughput, security, and fair transaction ordering, Hedera strives to establish a trust layer for the internet.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.