- Compare
- Frequency vs Arbitrum Nova
Frequency vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Transaction Volume
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Block Time
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Finality
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Type
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Launch Date
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Frequency vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Miners
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Hashrate
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Governance
Frequency and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Other Comparisons
Frequency Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Frequency
Frequency enables Web3 social at scale and is the first production implementation of the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP.org). Frequency is designed so that applications collaborate instead of competing when submitting transactions.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.