- Compare
- Fantom vs Arbitrum Nova
Fantom vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Fantom TPS is 0.69 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Fantom max TPS is 180.6 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Fantom max theoretical TPS is 1,476 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Fantom transaction volume is 2,472 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Fantom block time is 2.06s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Fantom finality is 0s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Fantom is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Fantom was launched on Dec 27, 2019, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Fantom vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Fantom Nakamoto Coefficient is 2, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Fantom has 14 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Fantom stake is $23.56M, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Fantom is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Fantom governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Fantom Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Fantom
Fantom is a high-performance, scalable, and secure smart contract platform engineered to surpass the constraints of preceding blockchain platforms. Operating as a permissionless, decentralized, and open-source network, Fantom leverages Lachesis, its asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerance (aBFT) consensus mechanism. This innovative approach enables Fantom to achieve remarkable speed and affordability compared to older technologies while maintaining exceptional security standards.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.