Real-time TPS
Ethereum TPS is 100% more than Crust TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Ethereum max TPS is 1,094X more than Crust max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Ethereum max theoretical TPS is 92.06% less than Crust max theoretical TPS
Block Time
Ethereum block time is 3.35% less than Crust block time
Finality
Ethereum finality is 16X more than Crust finality
Type
Ethereum is a layer 1 blockchain, while Crust is a parachain
Governance
Ethereum off-chain governance is worse than Crust on-chain governance
Launch Date
Ethereum was launched 7 years before Crust
Ethereum vs Crust Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Ethereum Comparisons
Crust Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Ethereum
Ethereum emerges as a decentralized, open-source blockchain platform empowering developers to craft and deploy smart contracts alongside dApps. Pioneering the smart contract concept, Ethereum enables self-executing agreements with terms directly encoded into its blockchain, eliminating the need for intermediaries. Additionally, Ethereum serves as a hub for the creation and exchange of NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) and various digital assets. Its intrinsic cryptocurrency, Ether (ETH), facilitates network transactions and incentivizes miners to uphold network security. Ethereum's evolution to Ethereum 2.0 introduces a proof-of-stake (PoS) mechanism, aiming to enhance scalability and energy efficiency.
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.