- Compare
- Ethereum vs Arbitrum Nova
Ethereum vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Ethereum TPS is 16.27 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Ethereum max TPS is 62.34 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Ethereum max theoretical TPS is 119.1 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Ethereum transaction volume is 58,563 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Ethereum block time is 12.04s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Ethereum finality is 12m 48s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Ethereum is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Ethereum was launched on Jul 30, 2015, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Ethereum vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Ethereum Nakamoto Coefficient is 2, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Ethereum has 1,082,000 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Ethereum stake is $151.8B, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Ethereum is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Ethereum governance is off-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Ethereum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Ethereum
Ethereum emerges as a decentralized, open-source blockchain platform empowering developers to craft and deploy smart contracts alongside dApps. Pioneering the smart contract concept, Ethereum enables self-executing agreements with terms directly encoded into its blockchain, eliminating the need for intermediaries. Additionally, Ethereum serves as a hub for the creation and exchange of NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) and various digital assets. Its intrinsic cryptocurrency, Ether (ETH), facilitates network transactions and incentivizes miners to uphold network security. Ethereum's evolution to Ethereum 2.0 introduces a proof-of-stake (PoS) mechanism, aiming to enhance scalability and energy efficiency.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.