Real-time TPS
Chainspect
Electroneum TPS is 1.66 tx/s, while Litentry TPS is coming soon
1.66 tx/s
Soon
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Chainspect
Electroneum max TPS is 16.13 tx/s, while Litentry max TPS is coming soon
16.13 tx/s
Soon
Max Theoretical TPS
Chainspect
Electroneum max theoretical TPS is 286 tx/s, while Litentry max theoretical TPS is coming soon
286 tx/s
Soon
NEW
Total Transactions
Chainspect
Electroneum total txns is 5,961 txns, while Litentry total txns is coming soon
5,961 txns
Soon
Block Time
Chainspect
Electroneum block time is 5s, while Litentry block time is coming soon
5s
Soon
Finality
Chainspect
Electroneum finality is 0s, while Litentry finality is coming soon
0s
Soon
Type
Chainspect
Electroneum is a layer 1 blockchain, while Litentry type is unknown
Layer 1 blockchain
Soon
Governance
Chainspect
Electroneum governance is council, while Litentry governance is coming soon
Council
Soon
Launch Date
Chainspect
Electroneum was launched on Oct 30, 2017, while the Litentry launch date is unknown
Oct 30, 2017
Soon
Other Comparisons
Electroneum Comparisons
Litentry Comparisons
- Litentry vs Acala
- Litentry vs Ajuna Network
- Litentry vs Astar
- Litentry vs Bifrost
- Litentry vs Crust
- Litentry vs Frequency
- Litentry vs Hydration
- Litentry vs Integritee
- Litentry vs Litentry
- Litentry vs Mythos
- Litentry vs Moonbeam
- Litentry vs NeuroWeb
- Litentry vs peaq
- Litentry vs Pendulum
- Litentry vs Phala Network
- Litentry vs Robonomics
- Litentry vs Polkadot
- Litentry vs Zeitgeist
About Blockchains
About Electroneum
Electroneum is a Layer 1 EVM-compatible blockchain, catering to 4+ million users worldwide. The network boasts transaction speeds of just 5 seconds with instant finality and potentially the lowest smart contract fees available. Powered by the IBFT consensus mechanism and supported by known validators (targeting universities and Web3 infrastructure companies), the network is incredibly fast, secure and energy efficient.
About Litentry
Litentry is a Decentralized Identity Aggregation protocol across multiple networks. It features a DID indexing mechanism and a Substrate-based credit computation network. The protocol provides a decentralized, interoperable identity aggregation service that mitigates the difficulty of resolving agnostic DID mechanisms.